Nutrition in Critical illness
1. Factors Contributing to Nutritional Impairment in Critical Illness
Critical illness significantly affects nutrition due to metabolic, physiological, and practical factors. Key contributors include:
A. Hypermetabolism & Catabolism
Increased energy expenditure due to stress response.
Elevated protein breakdown → muscle wasting, negative nitrogen balance.
Causes: sepsis, burns, trauma, major surgery.
B. Inflammation & Hormonal Changes
Cytokine release (TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6) → anorexia, insulin resistance, increased gluconeogenesis.
Stress hormones (cortisol, catecholamines) → protein catabolism and lipolysis.
C. Reduced Oral Intake
Sedation, mechanical ventilation, altered consciousness.
Gastrointestinal dysfunction: nausea, vomiting, ileus, diarrhoea.
D. Medical Interventions
Fasting for procedures, imaging, surgery.
Certain medications: opioids, vasopressors, prokinetic agents affecting GI motility.
E. Pre-existing Conditions
Chronic illnesses (CKD, liver disease, malignancy) → baseline malnutrition.
Elderly patients at higher risk due to sarcopenia.
2. Nutritional Assessment Tools in the ICU
Early assessment is essential to guide nutrition therapy. Common tools include:
A. Subjective Tools
Subjective Global Assessment (SGA): Considers weight loss, intake, GI symptoms, functional capacity, physical exam.
Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (NUTRIC) Score: Specifically developed for ICU; considers age, APACHE II, SOFA, comorbidities, days from hospital to ICU admission, IL-6 (optional).
B. Anthropometric & Biochemical Measures
Weight, BMI, mid-arm circumference (difficult in ICU due to oedema).
Serum albumin/pre-albumin (limited reliability in acute illness).
C. Functional Measures
Handgrip strength (if feasible, often limited in ICU).
Key: NUTRIC score is widely used to identify patients who benefit most from aggressive nutrition support.
3. Nutritional Care Bundles in ICU
Bundles are structured protocols to optimize nutrition:
Components of ICU Nutrition Bundles
Early initiation of nutrition (ideally within 24–48 hours of ICU admission).
Prefer enteral feeding over parenteral (if gut functional).
Protocolised feeding: stepwise advancement to meet calorie/protein targets.
Monitoring tolerance: gastric residuals, abdominal distension, diarrhoea.
Glycaemic control and micronutrient supplementation.
Multidisciplinary involvement: dietitian, physician, nurse, pharmacist.
Goal: Reduce underfeeding, prevent complications like refeeding syndrome, maintain gut integrity.
4. Types of Feeding in Critical Illness
A. Enteral Nutrition (EN) – preferred if GI tract functional
Nasogastric (NG) Tube
Indications: short-term feeding (<4–6 weeks), functional stomach.
Advantages: easy placement, low cost.
Limitations: aspiration risk, reflux, discomfort.
Nasojejunal (NJ) Tube
Indications: impaired gastric emptying, high aspiration risk, pancreatitis.
Advantage: bypass stomach → reduced aspiration.
Limitations: more complex insertion, often needs imaging or endoscopy.
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG)
Indications: long-term feeding (>4–6 weeks), intact gut.
Advantages: stable, less discomfort, lower dislodgement risk.
Limitations: requires endoscopy, infection risk.
Radiologically Inserted Gastrostomy (RIG)
Similar to PEG but placed under imaging guidance (when endoscopy not possible).
Enteral feeding formulas:
Standard polymeric: intact protein, carbs, fats.
Semi-elemental: partially hydrolysed for malabsorption.
Disease-specific: renal, hepatic, diabetes-specific formulas.
B. Parenteral Nutrition (PN)
Indications:
Non-functional gut (ileus, bowel obstruction, severe pancreatitis, high-output fistula).
When Enteral Nutrition is contraindicated or insufficient.
Components: glucose, amino acids, lipids, electrolytes, vitamins, trace elements.
Risks: infection, metabolic complications, liver dysfunction.
Timing: Usually after 7 days if EN not possible; earlier if malnourished.
C. Oral Nutrition
For patients able to swallow and tolerate oral intake.
Supplements:
High-protein, high-calorie oral nutritional supplements.
Fortified meals, modular additions.
Note: Oral intake is often insufficient in ICU; monitoring intake is critical.
5. Practical Considerations
Early feeding: Early EN is associated with improved outcomes (reduced infections, gut mucosal atrophy, better nitrogen balance).
Protein targets: Critically ill often require 1.2–2 g/kg/day.
Energy targets: ~25–30 kcal/kg/day, adjusted for metabolic stress.
Monitoring: Daily assessment of tolerance, labs (electrolytes, glucose, liver, renal), weight, nitrogen balance.
Summary 
Go Back


